|
LUCA DI BONAVENTURA
Docente a contratto Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi"
|
Home |
Curriculum(pdf) |
Didattica |
Pubblicazioni
2018
- The Forecasting Performance of Dynamic Factor Models with Vintage Data
[Working paper]
Di Bonaventura, L.; Forni, M.; Pattarin, F.
abstract
We present a comparative analysis of the forecasting performance of two dynamic factor models, the Stock and Watson (2002a, b) model and the Forni, Hallin, Lippi and Reichlin (2005) model, based on vintage data. Our dataset that contains 107 monthly US “first release” macroeconomic and financial vintage time series, spanning the 1996:12 to 2017:6 period with monthly periodicity, extracted from the Bloomberg database† . We compute real-time one-month-ahead forecasts with both models for four key macroeconomic variables: the month-on-month change in industrial production, the unemployment rate, the core consumer price index and the ISM Purchasing Managers’ Index. First, we find that both the Stock and Watson and the Forni, Hallin, Lippi and Reichlin models outperform simple autoregressions for industrial production, unemployment rate and consumer prices, but that only the first model does so for the PMI. Second, we find that neither models always outperform the other. While Forni, Hallin, Lippi and Reichlin’s beats Stock and Watson’s in forecasting industrial production and consumer prices, the opposite happens for the unemployment rate and the PMI.
2018
- The Forecasting Performance of Dynamic Factor Models with Vintage Data
[Working paper]
Di Bonaventura, L.; Forni, M.; Pattarin, F.
abstract
We present a comparative analysis of the forecasting performance of two dynamic factor
models, the Stock and Watson (2002a, b) model and the Forni, Hallin, Lippi and Reichlin
(2005) model, based on vintage data. Our dataset that contains 107 monthly US “first
release” macroeconomic and financial vintage time series, spanning the 1996:12 to 2017:6
period with monthly periodicity, extracted from the Bloomberg database†
. We compute
real-time one-month-ahead forecasts with both models for four key macroeconomic
variables: the month-on-month change in industrial production, the unemployment rate, the
core consumer price index and the ISM Purchasing Managers’ Index. First, we find that
both the Stock and Watson and the Forni, Hallin, Lippi and Reichlin models outperform
simple autoregressions for industrial production, unemployment rate and consumer prices,
but that only the first model does so for the PMI. Second, we find that neither models
always outperform the other. While Forni, Hallin, Lippi and Reichlin’s beats Stock and
Watson’s in forecasting industrial production and consumer prices, the opposite happens
for the unemployment rate and the PMI.